Tag Archives: mccain

The Latest Poll Bounce

For the third time in this long election season, Barack Obama is seeing a large gap open to his favor in the polls. Gallup Daily has him winning by 8 points, Rasmussen has him winning by 6 and in every other major poll in this country he is ahead of his rival, Republican John McCain. On a CBS morning talk show the day a Washington Post poll revealed the first of such leads, it was stated that no candidate since 1948 has lost from the position Barack Obama is in right now. 

However, the detractors would claim that Obama has bumped and bounced before. What’s different this time?

Unlike the other big leads Obama has held this election season (mind you, he has led consistently besides for a few days after the Republican National Convention), Barack Obama is seeing substance behind the bounce and this time it isn’t only he that’s doing it for him. Something in this country has happened that has people thinking twice about the silly emails they receive about Obama being a Muslim. A crisis has struck while the Republicans sat and warned about crises on the loom; this bounce, and now this election, is different because it comes out of an actual event, something tangible that has made people wake up and realize where the future of this country needs to be. Rather than listen to McCain ramble about earmarks and sing about bombing Iran, America has been thrust into a reality that only one leader of the two can actually fix. The market meltdown is something that affects every single American citizen and McCain has dug himself into a hole by declaring that the “economy is fundamentally strong,” by “suspending” his campaign and “postponing” the debate in an obvious political ploy, and by shooting himself in the foot by making a Vice Presidential pick that shows what he means when he says “country first”: nothing. 

The economic problems in this country have only just begun, unfortunately. Today, the widely controversial $700 bailout was defeated in the house in what was considered to be an easy passage until Old Maverick decided it was the place of the guy who declared he knows nothing of the economy to come fix the situation! Presidential politics had no place in something that was effectively a Capitol Hill battle; McCain, a little down at the news of the polls, just thought that he’d make himself look like a “leader” and put “country first” again by stopping the world for a photo op. While the country is distracted by this and the defeat of this monstrous chunk of tax payer money, the biggest financial institutions in the country are either being bought out, collapsed, or both! 

As the problems sustain and grow and as the mendacity of the McCain campaign, their cynical and tired political ads, and Pitbull Palin become a further, more visible burden for voters, expect this bounce to be final.

Thought: The “Real” Candidates

Today I read an article on John McCain that made me cringe a bit. Then, the thought of the article itself made me cringe a bit more. Its no wonder that people are reluctant to through their support and hearts behind a candidate when at every opportunity people are trying to cover them with slander and spotlight parts of their lives which somehow serve to show the “real” selves they are. The fact is, as people may or may not choose to take note of, these people are public servants. These people have ALREADY been elected to government positions and you have the opportunity to look at their voting records to see if any of these stupid allegations translate to their actions.  The article quoted this from a new book on McCain:  “Three reporters from Arizona, on the condition of anonymity, also let me in on another incident involving McCain’s intemperateness. In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain’s hair and said, “You’re getting a little thin up there.” McCain’s face reddened, and he responded, “At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you cunt.” McCain’s excuse was that it had been a long day. If elected president of the United States, McCain would have many long days.”  It also later quotes the book as follows: What should voters make of this pattern? In February 2008 Tim Russert succinctly described McCain on MSNBC’s Morning Joe. A devilish grin spread from ear to ear as Russert, no McCain hater, leaned forward and spoke in a whisper, “He likes to fight.” Russert got it right. But the big question isn’t whether McCain likes to fight: it’s who, when, and how. The point of the article was to paint him as  this fighter with a horrible temper. Now, I’m no McCain supporter and I definitely don’t approve of these actions if the allegations are correct… but I do have a horrible time understanding how this would reflect him as a president. Look, I don’t think he would be an extraordinary president and he’s not the candidate of my choice by any means, but there are more concrete things that actually relate to the presidency that are known about this man… additionally, there is such a thing as the House in this country as well as the Supreme Court. We have something known as the “Checks-and-Balances” system and we also have something known as “impeachment”. If we really do elect some kind of Manchurian Candidate or a tempered bigot or whatever other ridiculous dirt is being dug up and emailed out to brainwash voters, then I have news for you voters: we can correct mistakes. People have forgotten this, because nobody would challenge George W. Bush but the President cannot do whatever he wants, he doesn’t have full say over anything, and he certainly can be ‘fired’. Its a job like any other job… we’re not electing our mediator with a divine entity, we’re electing a public official. Granted, its the most executive public official, but we are the public and he works for us. 

Thought: Mindblowing McCain Mistakes

Remind me again why this guy is supposedly the best experienced in a time of war? He seems to know nothing about foreign policy!!! Not to mention its like George W. Bush’s older and more senile self! Putin is, of course, from Russia.  No comment on that one…    

Thought: Clinton “Slams” Obama on Wright

Hillary Clinton’s a misguided woman. Its so typical of the nature of her campaign to take a question on her own mistake and turn it into an attack on someone else. When we look at the integrity of the candidates, Obama could have certainly pointed the finger at pastors related to the other candidates or he could have pointed at mistakes completely unrelated to that incident that his candidates had committed, like lying to the American people. But he wouldn’t do that, because the man has some dignity. Instead, he made a speech answering the critics as to what his relationship with Reverend Wright was. The same opportunity has been given to Hillary Clinton. She has been given the chance to show that she can simply answer for her own mistakes in misleading people on her foreign policy experiences, but she has chosen to pass the buck and point the finger. In fact, given her recent campaign demeanor, she probably kept that finger tucked inside her coat waiting to bring it out when she herself slipped up. She has been quoted as saying that the man “wouldn’t have been [her] pastor” and ridiculed Barack Obama on his comparison to his church as his family. Well, I hope the neo-conservatives chew her up for not having a close enough relationship to her spiritual advisors if she thinks they can just be dumped and substituted and I hope that someone films her religious leader’s sermons and picks out the moments that seem most controversial. What a horrid sentiment – to answer a question with blame. I certainly hope by the end of this she’ll have a decent reputation in tact because at the moment she’s revealing herself to be a bulldog and a large detriment to the overall decency of the Democratic party. 

Thought: Obama Unpatriotic? Or More Patriotic Than Others?

A while ago, a picture from this video went around apparently trying to show that Barack Obama wouldn’t put his hand over his heart during the “Pledge of Allegiance”. Well, sorry to break it to all of you, but it wasn’t the Pledge, it was the national anthem and if you look at the mouths of all of the candidates, the only one who sings AT ALL is Barack Obama. What would you rather have? A politician who places his hand over his heart just for the sake of it or a man who is as passionate and as patriotic as to sing along without even knowing he’s being seen do so? Watch their mouths closely and decide for yourself. 

Thought: Wright

People are funny. Information can surface the internet for weeks and months without a significant response… in fact, a person may be asked on occasion to address the information, as it pertains to him, when a tiny response does begin to brew and, lo and behold, eventually Good Morning America might put a packaged-and-wrapped sample of the information on live television and there goes the neighborhood! Of course, I am referring to the, as it has been so often called, “soundbite” video clip of Reverend Jeremiah Wright of the United Trinity Church of Chicago, Illinois and his… how do I put this… “racy” words.  To get the ball rolling, Jeremiah Wright is a pastor in Chicago. The man is a black preacher for an inner city church who grew up in the hardships of the civil rights movement. Without defending the man, because I don’t believe him to be a great one by any means, give him a break. Take your camera into every church, synagogue, and mosque in this country and film a couple sermons and you’ll have a field day putting together clips of ‘controversial’ material. There is no such thing as “PC” or political correctness in a church because, much to the dismay of the Bush administration and everyone so shocked that a politician could actually have different views to his pastor,  its not a place of politics! I challenge you to sit in your pew at whatever respective prayer house you belong to and agree with everything you hear coming from the pulpit. Now, film the whole thing and pick the moments in each sermon that got you and put them altogether for maximum effect!   With this said, the news and mainstream media has taken these words and emphasized the parts that really curdle the blood to a point where the brain isn’t able to actually look at what is being said. The words themselves are atrocious and quite uneasy to stomach, but that might be because it has been fed to all of us as the product I spoke of earlier (thank you ABC) and we were not sitting in the pews for that sermon (lucky us – who knows how much spit comes flying off that lip). When he urged his congregation to say “God damn America” instead of “God bless America”, he doesn’t stop at the America… there was a little bit left of that sentence and it said “God damn America FOR TREATING ITS CITIZENS AS LESS THAN HUMAN.” Quick note to Reverend Jeremiah Wright: the country you are damning is the same country that allows you the freedom to stand by the pulpit and say what you want to say, you tool. You can criticize the country for its actions against whomever you want, but “damning” is a bit overboard don’t you think? Anyway, while the man is off-base and, a little bit disturbing in his rhetoric, his aim doesn’t seem to be to incite a hatred for this country, its to give his congregation a kick and warn them that through his eyes he doesn’t see it as a stable and steady friend to their community. And, when you think about his own history and the history of the black people in this country, you can understand that the relationship is a little bit shaky. Let his mistake of going over the top and saying “God damn America” be his own mistake though and not Senator Obama’s who was not even in attendance when this was said! And the argument that he would have ‘heard about this kind of thing’ would imply that the congregation would have gossiped about that fiery line in the sermon, but as I understand, people don’t leave church and criticize the pastor unless of course he doesn’t do his job. And by the fact that he has been preaching at the church for decades to regulars like Oprah Winfrey (yes, she also goes to his church), I have a hard time believing that he doesn’t do his job. Wright is an orator who uses powerful (even unnecessarily so) images to convey his message and as Reverend Floyd Lake of Allen A.M.E Church rightfully says, “anyone can grab a snippet and make something out if it, particularly if they have a political agenda.” I think the fact that people like Oprah haven’t been targeted for their own membership at this church shows that this is a political target. What people are being so fickle about is that the black church specifically (although all religious prayer houses are prone) is passionate and “prophetic”. While sometimes speculative and inaccurate, and often times exaggerative, they seek to inspire with such styles. Martin Luther King, Jr. talked about the Vietnam War as an example of American imperialism that may incur “God’s wrath’ and implying that America would be “put in its place” because of it. In fact, Reverends, ministers, pastors, and clergymen from around the country have sympathized with Wright because, quite frankly, its his job to fire up his congregation and I very much doubt that a man who himself speaks on peace and bridging the gaps of unity would support the notions of hatred that have been associated with Reverend Wright. If John Hagee (ya know, that pastor who sort’ve brushed up on the McCain radar then went away) can talk about Hurricane Katrina as a punishment to America and its harboring of homosexuals, you would think we’d all be a lot less sensitive to this kind of thing. In fact, speaking of McCain and pastors associated with him, his own pastor has come out against this huge media storm against Obama because of his minister. Reverend Dan Yeary, McCain’s long-time pastor, has said that the reality of a pastor and his congregant is that of a spiritual friendship. In fact, he claims that in the 15 years they have known each other they have never spoken about politics and he finds the idea that people could associate Obama’s views with Wright’s laughable. He said, “All preachers have a tendency to overstate because our passion is so intense. But I thought Obama did a fine job in response. He preserved his friendship with his pastor while disagreeing with him.” He also stated, “I’m sure John McCain would probably say the same thing about me if he were asked ‘so, do you agree with everything your pastor said?” while laughing. (Quotes from Yahoo! News) This country might have had the lines between church and state blurred in the last 7 years, but get a grip. If the presumptive Republican nominee’s pastor is coming out and defending Obama and his pastor, you might be able to understand just how far they actually should be and specifically in this case, how far the two different things are. Don’t fault someone on the man he chooses to speak to about his faith or to inspire him to lead a better life because of things that man has said about things totally unrelated. You’ll never be happy with a response by Barack Obama no matter what it is because you choose to live in fear of something you pretend not to know about because you refuse to actually research it. If you did, of course, you would have known about it BEFORE it reached Good Morning America… or did you only see it on FOX?  

Thought: The Terrorist Attack in Jerusalem/The Reactions

Thursday night saw a brutal terrorist attack on a yeshiva in Jerusalem. Eight people so far have been confirmed dead and the Jewish world is stunned, to say the least. While there is a lot to say on the topic as a whole, I will try to respond to a few things that are most important:1. The UN Security Council was blocked in putting out an official condemnation of the attacks because Libya decided it would not put out a condemnation without tying the attack to IDF action in Gaza. Excuse me for saying so but when, in the same breath, you call the country a “terrorist regime”, there is a hatred and a bias there and Libya should be, to put it nicely, removed from the UN Security Council. Need I say that when the IDF defended the citizens of Israel by carrying out ground operations in Gaza against terrorist cells who hide behind civilians like cowards and therefore bring harm their way, Israel was condemned in every capacity. When a Palestinian terrorist walks into a house of religious learning on the eve of a very festive religious month for these learners and shoots off automatic gunfire, no it shouldn’t be condemned. Can you -imagine- if an IDF soldier or a Jewish militant walked into a mosque or a Madrassah and started firing automatic gunfire at students learning the Koran!? 2. What kind of statement does it make that the Palestinians are celebrating this? Are you serious? This isn’t a military battle, it isn’t “invading forces”, it isn’t the “oppressive IDF”, its innocent young men. We’re not talking about collateral damage, shrapnel, or crossfire – we’re talking about a targeted attack on innocent people in a yeshiva. What kind of sick mentality justifies this and celebrates it and how can we hope for peace with that mentality in place? 3.  I want to recognize the Western world in coming to the party this time and actually condemning the attack. Four major names (all politics aside for the moment – we’ll get to that in a second) came out and categorically condemned this attack (more will soon, I hope). Some wrap-ups there (courtesy of www.haaretz.com): George W. Bush has said “America stands firm with Israel…” (more than that obviously, but I’d like to focus more on Obama and Clinton), Senator Barack Obama has said “The United States must strongly support Israel’s right and capability to defend itself. Today, our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families, and with the Israeli people who defeat these terrorists every single day that they go about their daily lives,” and Hillary Clinton has said “The United States and the international community must make clear that such deplorable acts of terrorism will not be tolerated and we must continue to stand with Israel in its fight against terror.”  British Foreign Secretary David Milibrand has also been vocal, perhaps more so than anyone in the Western world, about this attack.4. The reason I  pointed to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton is to ask this. Why, by March 7th, has there been no official condemnation from the Republican candidate Senator John McCain? Isn’t he supposed to be the man that’s so good for the Jews and for Israel? The one who’s going to stand by Israel? Or is he so buddy-buddy with George W. Bush that Bush’s statement reflects both of their feelings? I’d like to know why his office has remained so silent in the face of this attack and how he justifies this. 

Thought: Democrats – Where We Go From Here And Why We Need To Speed

As unfortunate it is that we’re still stumbling along in the process of nominating a Democratic candidate for the general election, it is important for each of us to do a little bit of searching within ourselves to really think about why we’re here and where we’re going in this whole ordeal. Prior to Texas and Ohio, this was supposed to be the last big hoorah for Clinton. She is a lucky woman to still be in this race, the experts say, but is she even still in it? And how important is it to have sour milk in the fridge? Hillary Clinton’s made martyrdom of her campaign. In realizing that Obama wasn’t going to be ridden easily, she opted to go on the attack herself and criticized the media for never attacking on their part. As a result, Senator Obama who is actually running a campaign and not a lesson in smear and spin tactics, has to answer the same ridiculous questions day-in and day-out about things that should -not- be asked of the frontrunner of the Democratic candidacy. How sullen are you, Senator Clinton? To hesitate on the question of Obama’s religion as if you didn’t know any better… to copy the scare tactics of the Bush administration who you so casually scold at every opportunity… to mock your opponent’s campaign slogan… to make yourself a hypocrite by claiming to run against Obama is an “honor” and then to attempt to destroy his political career at every stop. As far as a united party goes, you, ma’am, are not the candidate to lead one and you cannot be the candidate to lead a country. Any candidate who selfishly initiates and escalates  in-fighting on the waves of her support only to hide behind her fake smile and call this election an “honor” is not a candidate who should be praised or supported. In fact, by the way she’s harped on about her experience for the job of Commander in Chief, you’d think she was the candidate who wanted 100 years more in Iraq. But that’s fine if she isn’t, she’ll settle for helping him by poisoning her own party. Let me say that, if for no other reason, you should quit while you’re ahead and while you have SOME dignity to spare.  The good news is that Barack Obama has virtually the same lead as he had (and as he pointed out) as he did the morning of the 4th, the night of the 3rd, and the tense weeks leading up to yesterday’s primaries/caucus. While we would have hoped for a clear path to victory, I’m comforted by the fact that Clinton only took in a net gain of 4 delegates from the spoils and therefore is still trailing the candidate who will change this country. On that note, John McCain opened up a wonderful little gap for the Democrats yesterday in his acceptance speech and in his noble (and successful) journey for the ever-senile president’s endorsement this morning. If the Democrats are going to call themselves (one of them rightfully, one of them wrongfully) the ‘change’ candidates then they need to stop bickering (that’s you, Senator Clinton) and move on with the show. The one thing Mike Huckabee said was that the Republicans have maintained honor in their campaign… not sure I thought I’d ever say this, but he’s right. Out with the in-fighting! My advice to the Democrats is to let the campaign continue without the ‘kitchen sink strategy’ only long enough to show that they can be civil at which point Clinton rallies behind Obama who seizes the opportunity to save this country from a third term of Bushism in John McCain.  It is important that we all look at the status of the Democratic party and look at what needs to be done. The Republicans have their candidate, let’s unify behind ours. 

Thought: Senator Barack Obama/Texas Debate Response

As we move into a new (alright now, you might be a Clinton fan… or worse, a McCain supporter, but I have to assume for the good of humanity that you also believe in a discourse from Bush’s America) era in the good country of America, there are thousands of things that need mending. Quite frankly, it would be redundant to ramble on the failures of the Bush administration, but the opposite is true for the potential of the next administration. In fact, not enough can be said about Barack Obama. What struck me in the last debate between himself and Clinton was that if certain supporters of Obama’s fan base really do not know of his accomplishments in the slightest, two things must be true:

1. The man has achieved an 11-contest sweep to make realistic a Hollywood-like run for Presidency without milking every little thing he’s done AS PART OF HIS JOB AND RESPONSIBILITY as a servant of this nation and its government (the “experienced” candidates only seem more experienced because all they do is talk about what they’ve done and said in the past!)
2. It must be assumed that a large portion of the people who are NOT for Obama do not know about him either (not to mention his accomplishments) and take an almost partisan disliking to him.
It has been shown in the last few primaries as well as in general opinion that Obama’s fan base is growing… in fact, it is absorbing independents, Clintonites, and McCainheads across the country. Why? Perhaps, people are putting aside the automatic “he’s not my candidate, I won’t embrace him” attitude and learning a little bit about what has allowed this man to make politics magical again.
This man has brought back eloquent speaking and the idea of a leader who lifts up his nation. No wonder his wife talks about politics and pride the way that she does, its true! There has not been a single man or woman who has had the fire that this man has in a LONG time. Correct he is in saying that his is the type of leadership that is desperately needed in this country and in its time of healing and re-building. We don’t need some figurehead, we need a leader. We need for people to be able to rally behind someone as a symbol for their commitment to the promise of tomorrow. Yes, the candidates agree that a change is needed… but the only candidate who has put himself in the position to usher in a new era of hope, a new feeling of pride, and a new sense of unity for prosperity in this country is Barack Obama.
Let it be known that as this decade ends, it is one characterized by lost souls. It has been a decade of misadventure into iPlanet because reality has been too complex and non-giving. Let it also be known that change is already occurring in America with a young senator in a more commanding seat in this nation than the president himself. Barack Obama’s already made good on his promise for change we can believe in. After all, look at what he’s done to unify people out of office. The next decade needs to be one where our people come back to life and care once more. We need to arrive at a place where our sicknesses are not our deaths and our houses are our homes not burdens. We need to march forward, together, behind a man whose fire is bright enough to lead us out of darkness and light up our future.